Pages

Protect Your Computer

Buy McAfee AntiVirus Software
Showing posts with label terrorists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label terrorists. Show all posts

September 26, 2012

Who Killed Ambassador Stevens?

"Reaction should have been, if it was genuine, should have been six months earlier. So it was postponed until the 11th of September. They chose this date, 11th of September to carry a certain message."
Mohamed Magarief, with Ann Curry

President Mohamed Magarief of Libya knows without a doubt that the movie "Innocence of Muslims," produced by Egyptian immigrant to the United States, Noukala Basseley Noukala, had "nothing to do with" a deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. 

According to NBC News:
Magarief said there were no protesters at the site before the attack, which he noted came in two assaults, first with rocket-propelled grenades on the consulate, then with mortars at a safe house....Magarief told [NBC News' Ann] Curry that based on the accuracy of the assault, he believes the attackers must have had training and experience using the weapons.
Although U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice initially claimed the attack to have been inspired by the cheap, poorly made movie, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney last week said it was "self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack."

National Counterterrorism Center Director Matthew Glen Olsen, a 1988 Harvard Law School graduate (completing his legal studies just months before Obama entered Harvard Law), who previously served as general counsel for the National Security Agency, said the perpetrators were likely an offshoot of al-Qaida, similar to its North African branch-- al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb--which
has been among the beneficiaries of the shift in power from Al Qaeda’s central leadership in Pakistan to its far-flung affiliates across the Middle East and Africa. This shift was likely accelerated by the killing in Pakistan in June 2012 of Abu Yahya al-Lib, the deputy to Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri, by an American drone strike. 
After two figures who reportedly replaced Osama bin Ladin were recently killed by drone attacks--Ayman al-Zawahri, an Egyptian surgeon, and Abu Yahya al-Libi , Qaeda commander who became Mr. Zawahri’s deputy after Bin Laden’s death in in 2011--it was predicted that increased violence would occur. 

New Muslim Groups Taking Over?

According to Eric Schmitt's excellent analysis published on June 7, 2012 in the New York Times, it was expected that younger, more impetuous fighters would vie to seize the mantle of global leadership, and he predicted the most likely group to present itself would be:
  • the affiliate in Yemen, formally known as Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, or A.Q.A.P., who three times in the last three years have tried unsuccessfully to blow up commercial airliners bound for the United States. The most recent plot was thwarted last month when the suicide bomber turned out to be simultaneously working for the Saudi, British and American intelligence agencies. .
Schmitt continuing by saying "Al Qaeda’s wings in Yemen, North Africa and even Iraq have had little difficulty sustaining a wave of violence, a trend that is likely to continue well after Mr. Libi’s death, officials said." He then detailed a list of possible groups where violence may erupt:
Somali group, Shabab

Islamic Maghreb





Boko Haram member






    Nasser al-Wuhayshi
  •  In Iraq a few hundred "Sunni extremists" said to have ties to Al Qaeda’s branch were likely responsible for at least some of the major bombings against the government of Bashar al-Assad in Syria. 


More Confident U.S. Leadership?

There is certainly no shortage of suspects of outside groups which may have been active in Libya. What is somewhat comforting to westerners, however, is the fact that the U.S. State Department and its consultants, whoever they are, seem to be much more knowledgeable than the previous Republican administration about these Muslim groups working to thwart attempts by a segment of the population within these areas in the Middle East wishing to depart from theocratic control of their governments.


Although it didn't happen instantly, it seems that American officials are getting around to realizing what really occurred in Libya. Eli Lake of The Daily Beast reported earlier this morning:
The intelligence officials who spoke to The Daily Beast did so anonymously because they weren’t authorized to speak to the press. They said U.S. intelligence agencies developed leads on four of the participants of the attacks within 24 hours of the fire fight that took place mainly at an annex near the Benghazi consulate. For one of those individuals, the U.S. agencies were able to find his location after his use of social media. “We had two kinds of intelligence on one guy,” this official said. “We believe we had enough to target him.”

Another U.S. intelligence official said, “There was very good information on this in the first 24 hours. These guys have a return address. There are camps of people and a wide variety of things we could do.” ...
The Daily Beast reported last week that the U.S. intelligence community was studying an intercept between a Libyan politician and a member of the so-called February 17 militia, Libyans charged with providing security for the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. More intelligence has come in that shows members of Ansar al-Sharia, an al Qaeda–affiliated group operating in and around Benghazi, were attempting to coerce, threaten, cajole, and bribe members of the militia protecting the consulate.
Reuters issued a report this week stating that the government in Libya 
"placed two powerful freelance units in the city under the command of full-time army officers on Monday. Commanders of two units which have, with official sanction, been providing security since the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi were ordered removed and the men of the February 17 Brigade and Rafallah al-Sahati militia put under army orders. A third unit, Libya's Shield, would also change leadership, an official said."
The Associated Press disclosed last weekend:
On Friday evening, hundreds of protesters angry over last week's killing of the U.S. ambassador to Libya stormed the compound of the Islamic extremist Ansar al-Shariah Brigade militia suspected in the attack, evicting militiamen and setting fire to their building. After taking over the Ansar compound, protesters then drove to attack the Benghazi headquarters of Rafallah Sahati where militiamen opened fire on the protesters, who were largely unarmed, leaving at least 20 wounded, and several killed according to hospital sources. 

Photo: Mohammad Hannon / AP

April 10, 2011

Who Did Edwin Wilson Really Work For?

From the January, 2000 issue of From The Wilderness
by Michael C. Ruppert
Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil
"Reprinted with permission, Michael C. Ruppert and From The Wilderness Publications, www.copvcia.com, P.O. Box 6061-350, Sherman Oaks, CA, 91413. 818-788-8791. FTW is published monthly, annual subscriptions are $50 per year." 


Manhunt: The Incredible Pursuit of a CIA Agent Turned Terrorist The following is written after examining more than 900 pages of documents, in four volumes, filed since last September, in Houston Federal Court, by attorneys representing former CIA operative Edwin P. Wilson and the United States Department of Justice. As strange as it may seem, FTW assures you that there is a document on file or an on-the-record quote to support everything we now tell you.

On February 2, 1983, the Houston trial of former CIA agent Edwin P. Wilson, on Federal charges that he had unlawfully sold explosives to Libya, hung at a truly precarious moment. In chambers, the Judge hearing the case had refused to allow a CIA witness, using the pseudonym William Larson, to testify using a false name. The CIA, and prosecutors like aggressive Northern Virginia Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) Ted Greenberg, relying on investigative materials produced under the direction of Washington, D.C. AUSAs Larry Barcella and Carol Bruce, were also concerned about limiting Wilson's ability to cross examine Larson for "security" reasons. Larson's intended testimony would have included statements that, according to CIA records under Larson's care, Ed Wilson had not been a CIA employee or done any work for the Agency since 1971.

According to Barcella, who gave a detailed interview to FTW for this story, the Judge's ruling raised serious security concerns for the Justice Department. The CIA records issue still needed to be addressed from another angle - and quickly. Wilson's defense had already made the case that the CIA had known and sanctioned the activities for which he was now on trial. That position needed to be countered in the rebuttal phase before the case went to the jury. Time was running out. 

Honored and Betrayed: Irangate, Covert Affairs, and the Secret War in Laos

 Ed Wilson stood accused of shipping 42,000 pounds of the plastic explosive C-4 directly to Libyan dictator Moammar Qadaffy in 1977, and then hiring U.S. experts - former U.S. Army Green Berets - to teach Qadaffy's people how to make bombs shaped like lamps, ashtrays and radios.  Bombs were actually made, and foes of Qadaffy were actually murdered. This was the ongoing crime that had made Wilson, and his still-missing accomplice, former CIA employee Frank Terpil, the most infamous desperadoes in the world. C-4, according to some experts, is the most powerful non-nuclear explosive made. Two pounds in the right places can bring down a jumbo jet. Hence, 42,000 pounds would be enough to bring down 21,000 jumbo jets. C-4 is highly prized on the world's black markets and is much in demand. It is supposedly very tightly controlled where it is manufactured - in the U.S.

At the time it was shipped from Houston International Airport, in 1977, the 42,000 pounds of C-4 represented almost the entire United States domestic supply. It had been collected for Wilson by one California explosives distributor who collected it from a number of manufacturers around the country. Surprisingly, no one had officially noticed. Wilson had, in earlier and subsequent deals, also sold a number of handguns to Qadaffy, and several had been used in assassinations of Libyan dissidents in a number of countries, including the United States. It was these and other firearms violations by Wilson, including a scheme to ship more than a thousand M16 rifles to Qadaffy, that had put the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) and Larry Barcella on Wilson's trail back in late 1977.

That investigation, which resulted in a 1982 Virginia conviction, led to the discovery of the C-4 shipment to Qadaffy. By January of 1983 Barcella and a team of dedicated BATF agents had been on Ed Wilson's trail for five long years. Barcella, in Houston as an observer and advisor, had been "twiddling his thumbs most of the time," but he did testify as a witness.  He was, by virtue of his role as the originator of the cases, "the institutional memory" of DoJ. Ted Greenberg had, from the other side of the Potomac in Alexandria, taken over other investigations stemming from Wilson's activities which led eventually to the Eatsco scandal. That investigation involved Wilson cronies Tom Clines, Air Force General Richard Secord, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Eric von Marbod and the legendary Ted Shackley.